Bibliographic record
Abstract
O autor revisita os Tres ensaios sobre a teoria da sexualidade, afirmandoos como um acontecimento na teoria da seducao. Ao detalhar as diferentes versoes deste texto escrito por Freud, acentua a incessante afirmacao da sexualidade infantil com suas especificidades: pulsoes parciais, zonas erogenas, apoio, perversidade polimorfa. Apresenta duas linhas de pensamento que ligam os Tres ensaios a teoria da seducao: a existencia de dados nesse escrito que poderiam ter permitido a reconsideracao da teoria da seducao e a possibilidade de pensar sobre o papel da seducao nesse texto. O autor propoe algumas linhas de discussao: (a) a linha biologica, (b) a linha relacionada com o objeto e (c) as questoes do remanejamento da puberdade contidas no terceiro ensaio.Descreve a sua teoria de que a nocao de sexualidade generalizada, bem como a de uma perversao polimorfa infantil permanece presente, de forma latente e inconsciente no adulto. Isso responde a uma das objecoes mais importantes que Freud se coloca para falsificar a teoria da seducao. Afirma que todo adulto ve despertar em si a sua sexualidade perversa e que esse aspecto e passado nas mensagens mais precoces que sao enviadas a crianca (AU)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".