Analytical Solution of Non-Newtonian Nanofluid Flows Within Circular Duct under Convective Boundary Condition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At the outset, this work aims to carried out an analytical investigation of forced convection by establishing a laminar flow into circular duct under convective boundary conditions of the third type for non-Newtonian nanofluid, the fluid containing TiO2 uniformly dispersed in aqueous solution with 0.5wt% of CMC solutions (Carboxymethyl Cellulose) is used as working fluid. The viscous dissipation effects are taken into account, the employed methodology is based on a combination of the Ritz variational approach with the Laplace transformation technique, so the power-law fluids flow model is used to describe the non-Newtonian fluid behavior. The effect of dimensionless parameters such as Biot (Bi), Brinkman (Br), Peclet (Pe) numbers, power-law index (n), and nanoparticles concentration (φ) on the temperature distribution contours and on the examined local Nusselt number. Our results have been compared with those found in the literature in particular the cases of base fluids (φ=0) with and without viscous dissipation effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".