MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214368582 · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2021-bsg.16

OWE-4 National audit of diagnosis, management and surveillance in primary sclerosing cholangitis in the United Kingdom

2021· article· en· W3214368582 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Evangelia Fatourou, Sarah Hyde, Martine Walmsley, Graeme Alexander, Simon Rushbrook, Palak Trivedi, Douglas Thorburn

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Diseases and Immunity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePrimary sclerosing cholangitisInternal medicineGastroenterologyCohortPancolitisUrsodeoxycholic acidHepatologyGeneral surgeryColorectal cancerCancerColonoscopyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a rare disorder and as such clinical care can be heterogeneous. We audited PSC management across the UK against audit standards set by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG). Method All UK PSC investigators were invited to complete an electronic questionnaire on the PSC patient cohort encompassing demographics, diagnosis, bowel and biliary tract cancer surveillance, and risk stratification data (March 2019 - Jan 2021). Results 1,795 patients across 30 centres (liver units n = 1548, general gastroenterology units n = 247) were included. Median age at diagnosis was 51 years and 56.4% were men. Magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRCP) was performed as a diagnostic investigation in 1616 patients (90.0%) and 777 (43.3%) had a liver biopsy. Most were monitored by a hepatologist (n = 1610, 89.7%). 931 patients (51.9%) received non-licensed therapy with Ursodeoxycholic acid. 785 patients (43.7%) had not undergone disease staging or risk stratification within the last 2 years; where performed, it was most commonly by transient elastography (n = 645, 78.7%). Surveillance for biliary tract cancer was not undertaken in 515 patients (28.7%); when performed, it was most commonly by ultrasound (US) (n = 568, 47.1%) or alternating MRCP/US (n = 429, n = 35.6%). Ca 19 - 9 was utilised in 730 patients. Concurrent IBD was present in 1264 patients (70.4%) with 256 (20.3%) having had a colectomy. Where classified, pancolitis (Montreal classification E3) was the commonest disease distribution (673/939, 71.7%) with 1.6% (n = 15) having isolated ileal disease. In those without IBD, 142 (28%) patients had not had a colonoscopy and biopsies to exclude diagnosis. Among those with colitis without previous colectomy (n=743), 580 (78.1%) underwent annual colonoscopic surveillance; 30 (5.2%) with dye spray, 230 (39.7%) with biopsies and dye spray, and 252 (43.4%) with protocol biopsies alone. Conclusion There is unwarranted variation in the care of patients with PSC in the UK. In particular relating to risk stratification, exclusion of colitis and surveillance for biliary tract and colonic cancer. The lack of uniformity in clinical practice highlights the need for better education of clinicians about PSC management and the potential role of clinical networks for rare liver diseases within the UK.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.182

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLiver Diseases and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207