An Image-Based Radar Detector Approaching Optimal Likelihood Ratio Detector
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents an image-based radar detector, named neighborhood difference order statistics (NDOS) detector. Different from the classic likelihood ratio detector, the proposed detector treats the echo spectrum as an image and determines the existence of a target by comparing the difference between the test cell and its adjacent cells with a threshold. The closed-form expressions of probabilities of detection and false alarm are derived under Gaussian noise background and Swerling I target model. It is proved that the detection performance of the proposed detector approaches the optimal likelihood ratio detector when the homogenous noise power is known. When the noise power is unknown, we modify the detector into cell-averaging (CA) NDOS detector by estimating the noise power. Analytical derivations show that the CA-NDOS detector holds the constant false alarm rate (CFAR) property. Moreover, CA-NDOS detector possesses a better detection performance compared with two typical CFAR algorithms under the condition of typical reference window size.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it