MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214440686

Droit de la concurrence: l’Accord économique et commercial global et son contexte (Competition Law: The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement in Context)

2021· article· fr· W3214440686 on OpenAlexaffabout
Pierre Larouche

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicTaxation and Legal Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcurrencePolitical scienceHumanitiesContext (archaeology)JurisdictionCompetition (biology)Welfare economicsEconomicsLawGeographyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

French Abstract: Le chapitre 17 de l’AECG, portant sur la politique de concurrence, repose largement sur l’Accord Canada-UE concernant l’application de leur droit de la concurrence, datant de 1999. Meme si la politique de la concurrence semble enfouie au milieu de l’AECG, en pratique l’application des droits de la concurrence canadien et surtout europeen a souvent des effets transatlantiques, etant donne la conception maximaliste de la competence extraterritoriale qui prevaut partout en matiere de droit de la concurrence. Les autorites du Canada et de l’UE semblent bien collaborer en matiere de grands cartels mondiaux, mais l’Accord Canada-UE est trop limitatif quant aux echanges d’information. C’est en matiere de controle prealable des fusionnements que l’influence europeenne sur le sort des entreprises canadiennes se fait le plus sentir, et l’affaire Air Canada/Transat pourrait en illustrer les effets nocifs pour les entreprises et les consommateurs canadiens. Ni l’AECG ni l’Accord Canada-UE ne permettent de remedier a ces difficultes, lesquelles releveraient d’un accord multilateral sur la politique de concurrence, qui reste plus hypothetique que jamais. English Abstract: Chapter 17 CETA on competition policy largely rests on the 1999 Canada-EU Agreement on the application of competition law. Even if competition policy might seem buried in the thick of CETA, a look at practice should dispel any illusion as to its centrality. Given the maximalist approach to extraterritorial jurisdiction that prevails everywhere as regards competition law, the implementation of Canadian and – most significantly – EU law produces notable transatlantic effects. While EU and Canadian authorities seem to cooperate in the fight against global hard core cartels, the Canada-EU Agreement is too constraining as regards information exchange. Yet it is in merger control that the influence of EU law on Canadian firms is most clearly felt. The pending Air Canada/Transat merger could provide a perfect example of the potential for EU law to harm Canadian firms and consumers. Neither CETA nor the Canada-EU Agreement offers any remedy for these problems. The answer, if any, would have to come from a multilateral agreement on competition policy, which seems more elusive than ever.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.018
Scholarly communication0.0130.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicTaxation and Legal IssuesFrench-language works237,207