MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214691462 · doi:10.5194/sand-1-129-2021

Michigan International Copper Analogue (MICA) project – current status

2021· article· en· W3214691462 on OpenAlex
Axel Liebscher, Heini Reijonen, Ismo Aaltonen, Christina Lilja, Simon Norris, Lindsay Waffle, Nikitas Diomidis

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSafety of Nuclear Waste Disposal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsNuclear Waste Management Organization
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMillerRadioactive wasteNatural (archaeology)Copper miningCopperEngineeringArchaeologyForensic engineeringEnvironmental scienceWaste managementGeologyHistoryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. One of the key requirements for the deep geological disposal of high-level nuclear waste is the assessment of its long-term performance and safety (up to 1 Ma). Regarding engineered barrier system materials, such as copper, much of the data available comes from short-term investigations, such as laboratory experiments at different scales. Copper is an important part of many waste packaging and disposal concepts, e.g. KBS-3 developed in Sweden and Finland and Mark II developed in Canada. Natural analogues provide another important way of obtaining understanding on potential repository system behavior. Observations made from the geological systems can be utilized in the safety case, providing information on the assessment time scale. Copper analogue studies (both natural analogues and archaeological analogues) have been reported in the literature and they have been extensively reviewed by various authors (e.g. Miller et al., 2000) and by safety case projects (e.g. Reijonen et al., 2015) within waste management organizations. So far, only a few studies have focussed on the general stability of native copper within its natural media (e.g. Milodowski et al., 2000; Marcos, 2002). Keweenaw native copper occurrences (Lake Superior, USA) have been mentioned as a qualitative source of information (e.g. in Miller et al., 2000); however, data to be used in process-based safety assessments for geological disposal are lacking. These deposits have been mined for a long time and there is a great deal of knowledge related to them as well as samples collected, but no formal review has been made from the geological disposal point of view. The native copper at the Keweenaw area reflects various geological environments from bedrock to sediment and even anthropogenic mine site remnants and geochemical environments (e.g., anoxic vs. oxic, sulphur-free vs. sulphur-bearing). It thus provides a unique complementary data source that will be useful for estimating processes governing behavior of metallic copper. The MICA project phase I systematically collects and reviews the existing literature and data on the Michigan copper analogue sites and available sampling potential. Here, we present the current status of the project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.560
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it