Intermittent Ambient Cold Exposure Is Not an Effective Obesity Treatment in Mice Housed at Thermoneutrality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chronic ambient cold exposure has been regarded as a promising obesity treatment given it potently increases energy expenditure. However, few mammals are chronically exposed to cold ambient conditions without reprieve highlighting the need to determine whether more physiologically relevant interventions, such as intermittent ambient cold exposure, could be utilized to treat obesity. Moreover, most preclinical cold exposure work to date has been conducted at housing temperatures below thermoneutrality, unintentionally confounding metabolic outcomes. As such, this study examined whether intermittent ambient cold exposure could abrogate the metabolic impairments of diet‐induced obesity, in mice housed under humanized thermoneutral conditions. Eight‐week‐old male and female C57Bl/6J mice (n ≥ 40/sex) were singly housed, acclimated to thermoneutrality (30 °C), and then weight matched into low‐fat (LFD; 10% kcal from fat) or high‐fat (HFD; 45% kcal from fat) diet fed groups. Male and female mice were given six weeks to feed on their respective diets before being weight‐matched into groups that remained unperturbed (CTRL) or underwent intermittent ambient cold exposure (ICE), respectively. ICE consisted of exposure to 4 °C for one hour/day, five days/week, for four weeks. Mice remained on their respective diets for the entire four‐week intervention period, during which time glucose and insulin tolerance were assessed. Following the intervention mice were sedated with sodium pentobarbital and sacrificed by exsanguination of the heart. The epididymal and inguinal white adipose tissue depots (eWAT and iWAT, respectively), the interscapular brown adipose tissue depot (BAT), as well as the liver, triceps, and hypothalamus were excised, snap‐frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at ‐80 °C. ICE induced hyperphagia that was rapid in onset and persistent, occurring with every exposure independent of diet. Over time, this exacerbated rather than attenuated HFD‐induced obesity in both male and female mice, increasing BAT, eWAT, and iWAT mass as well as cellular lipid deposition. Pair‐feeding revealed that these ICE‐induced increases in adiposity were energy intake dependent, as the pair‐fed, but not ad libitum fed, HFD‐ICE group was protected from ICE‐induced increases in body mass. Despite exacerbating HFD‐induced obesity, ICE improved glucose tolerance, independent of diet, in a sex‐dependent manner. The effects of ICE on glucose tolerance were not attributed to improvements in whole‐body insulin tolerance, tissue specific insulin action, nor to differences in hepatic insulin clearance. Instead, ICE increased serum concentrations of insulin and C‐peptide in response to glucose, suggesting that ICE may improve glucose tolerance by potentiating pancreatic glucose‐stimulated insulin secretion. Taken together, this data suggests that intermittent ambient cold exposure, despite improving glucose tolerance, is not an effective obesity treatment in mice housed under humanized conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".