Recovery in Mobility by Community-Living Older Adults following Fragility Hip Fracture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aims This study describes recovery of mobility during inpatient rehabilitation and 12-weeks at home post-discharge in a group of community-living older adults following a fragility hip fracture and surgical repair.Methods A prospective descriptive design employed repeated measures of five mobility measures at inpatient rehabilitation admission, discharge, and at home 2-, 6-, and 12-weeks post-discharge. Mobility scores were compared to age- and sex-reference scores from the literature.Results The greatest gains in recovery were made during inpatient rehabilitation with continued improvement (p<.001) at home over 12-weeks on performance-based (Functional Independence Measure, Timed Up and Go, 6-Minute Walk, and Berg Balance Scale) and self-report (Composite Physical Function Scale) measures. Normative sex- and age-reference scores were not achieved at 12-weeks post-discharge.Conclusions The deficit in recovery to normative scores indicates that these older adults will continue to be at risk of further decline in functional and physical performance, and institutionalization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".