MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 12935: Lack of Correlation Between Echocardiographic Parameters and Cardiac Hemodynamics in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis

2021· article· en· W3214772277 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mirna Ragheb, Triston Eastman, Amir Ravandi, Malek Kass, Ashish H. Shah

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsSt. Boniface HospitalUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyStroke volumeCardiac outputInternal medicineHemodynamicsCardiac indexEjection fractionStenosisPopulationAortic valveHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Aortic stenosis (AS) affects ~10% of population over 65 years of age. Severe AS is defined as mean trans-aortic pressure gradient (MG) of ≥40 mmHg and/or aortic valve area (AVA) of <1.0 cm 2 . Patients’ symptoms correlate with cardiac output, and the ability to augment with exercise. However, the relationship between AVA/MG and stroke volume/cardiac output is not well defined. Hypothesis: We aimed to identify the relationship between conventional echocardiography-based parameters (i.e., AVA/MG) and non-echocardiography-based hemodynamics in AS. Methods: Consecutive patients with severe symptomatic AS undergoing TAVI between June and September 2020 at St. Boniface Hospital in Manitoba, Canada were recruited. Hemodynamics was measured using whole-body impedance-based Non-Invasive Cardiac System (NICaS). Evaluated hemodynamics include stroke volume index (Svi), cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), and total peripheral resistance (TPR) and were compared to conventional parameters. Results: Thirty patients (37% females; mean age 79.0 ± 1.7 years) were enrolled. Average MG was 41.8 ± 2.2 mmHg (16.94 - 70.0) and mean AVA was 0.81 ± 0.04 cm 2 (0.30 - 1.10). A linear regression model revealed a poor correlation between AVA and both Svi and CI (r 2 =0.012 and 0.025, respectively). Similarly, MG correlated poorly with Svi and CI (r 2 =0.017 and 0.024, respectively). Interestingly, 60% patients displayed a low-flow state (defined as Svi <35 ml/m 2 ), despite a normal left ventricular ejection fraction (EF >50%, r 2 =0.011). Conclusions: There is incongruence between hemodynamics and conventional parameters defining severe AS. A subset of patients have low-flow state, despite normal left ventricular function. It is plausible that some of these patients, based on their hemodynamics, may benefit from valvular intervention earlier, even at a lower MG. Long-term hemodynamic assessment may guide identification of outcomes in AS patients post-TAVI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→