MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214778334 · doi:10.1002/chem.202104041

Coordination‐Induced Band Gap Reduction in a Metal–Organic Framework

2021· article· en· W3214778334 on OpenAlexaff
Craig A. Peeples, Ahmet Çetinkaya, Patrik Tholen, Franz‐Josef Schmitt, Yunus Zorlu, Kai Yu, A. Özgür Yazaydın, Jens Beckmann, Gabriel Hanna, Gündoğ Yücesan

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry - A European Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsTrigonal bipyramidal molecular geometryCopperCrystallographyBand gapChemistryMicroporous materialMetalCrystal structureMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Herein, we report on the synthesis of a microporous, three‐dimensional phosphonate metal–organic framework (MOF) with the composition Cu 3 (H 5 ‐MTPPA) 2 ⋅ 2 NMP (H 8 ‐MTPPA=methane tetra‐ p ‐phenylphosphonic acid and NMP=N‐methyl‐2‐pyrrolidone). This MOF, termed TUB1, has a unique one‐dimensional inorganic building unit composed of square planar and distorted trigonal bipyramidal copper atoms. It possesses a (calculated) BET surface area of 766.2 m 2 /g after removal of the solvents from the voids. The Tauc plot for TUB1 yields indirect and direct band gaps of 2.4 eV and 2.7 eV, respectively. DFT calculations reveal the existence of two spin‐dependent gaps of 2.60 eV and 0.48 eV for the alpha and beta spins, respectively, with the lowest unoccupied crystal orbital for both gaps predominantly residing on the square planar copper atoms. The projected density of states suggests that the presence of the square planar copper atoms reduces the overall band gap of TUB1, as the beta‐gap for the trigonal bipyramidal copper atoms is 3.72 eV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry - A European JournalSame topicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207