MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Field Applications of Nanotechnology in the Oil and Gas Industry: Recent Advances and Perspectives

2021· article· en· W3214824189 on OpenAlex
Camilo A. Franco, Richard D. Zabala, I. Bahamon, Ángela Forero, Farid B. Cortés

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanofluidEnhanced oil recoveryPetroleum industryPetroleum engineeringUnconventional oilFossil fuelEnvironmental scienceHydraulic fracturingAsphalteneNanoparticleNanotechnologyMaterials scienceGeologyWaste managementChemical engineeringEnvironmental engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the early 21st century, nanotechnology has stood strong in the oil and gas industry, with many applications that have gone from laboratory and numerical simulation studies to successful trial applications in the field. In this Review, recent advances of nanofluid and nanoparticle applications in real environments of the oil and gas industry are presented. These applications cover more than 20 wells in Colombia that have been treated to overcome different formation damage mechanisms, such as asphaltene precipitation/deposition, fines migration, and inorganic scale deposition. Also, different approaches to enhance drilling fluids in Canada, Brazil, Iran, and Colombia are examined. In the case of improved oil recovery (IOR), different applications are discussed, including strategies to improve the productivity of heavy crude oil and extra-heavy crude oil reservoirs through enhanced mobility and hydraulic fracturing in Colombia, a field trial for water shutoff in Csongrad-3 formation in the Algyo field in Hungary, nanocapsules injection for wettability alteration, applications of gas injection (N2 and CO2) in the presence of nanoparticles in Austin chalk, Buda and Eagle Ford formations in the United States, and the use of nanoparticle-assisted foams for well dewatering in China. For secondary and tertiary recovery, we explore the design and implementation of A-Dots and carbon quantum dots as tracers in Saudi Arabia and Colombia, respectively, hydrophobic nanoparticles as drag reducers in injector wells in China, and nanofluids for enhancing chemical enhanced oil recovery processes in southern Colombia. It is worth mentioning that the results were based on oil production and reserves derived from production curves and analysis of the declination curves. Finally, challenges and perspectives of the role of nanotechnology in the oil and gas industry today are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it