New Method for Internal Pore-Water Pressure Measurements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The triaxial test is the most common procedure performed in a geotechnical laboratory to investigate the mechanical behavior of soils. However, often only global pore-water pressure (pwp) is measured at the bottom of specimen during conventional triaxial tests, which cannot detect the variation in internal pwp values to represent the true effective stress path adjacent to the failure surface. Here, a modified triaxial testing apparatus capable of measuring internal pwp within the soil using a filterless rigid piezometer (FRP) is outlined. To validate the effectiveness and capability of this novel test method, a series of consolidated undrained tests were conducted on saturated loose and dense sand. The FRP measurements provide a reliable pwp response, especially at pressures above 400 kPa where the FRPs have a faster response than the base transducer. Moreover, the internal pwp measured by FRPs during the initiation of shearing in loose sand can capture the rapid development of excess pwp before liquefaction or failure. The results also show that there are increases of 25 % in average peak strength of the loose specimen and 8 % in average residual strength of the dense specimen with internal pwp measurement, respectively, compared with only global pwp measurement because of the FRP installation. However, FRP installation appears to have no apparent effect on average peak strength of the dense specimen and average residual strength of the loose specimen. The new triaxial testing method can be applied to study the response and distribution of pwp at specific zones within the soil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".