Long-Term Enrollment in Cardiac Rehabilitation Benefits of Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Skeletal Muscle Strength in Females with Cardiovascular Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The benefits of short-term cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for improving fitness are well known, but the effects of long-term maintenance-phase CR are less well established. Moreover, changes in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and muscle strength with long-term CR have never been examined specifically in females, a population that is under-researched and under-represented in cardiovascular research. The objective of this retrospective pilot study was to estimate changes in CRF and muscle strength in females enrolled in a long-term CR program. Methods: Data from 39 females (mean ± standard deviation age 65 ± 9 years) enrolled for at least 1 year in a maintenance-phase CR program were analyzed. The program consisted of aerobic and resistance training, and data were collected annually for CRF (peak oxygen consumption [VO2peak, mL/kg/min]) and skeletal muscle strength (one-repetition maximum tests for chest press, seated row, and knee extension, kg). Mixed-model analyses were used to determine changes in CRF over the 5-year follow-up (203 observations) and muscle strength over 6 years (108 observations). Results: The CRF increased in females by 1.8%/year over 5 years of CR enrollment, and muscle strength increased by 0.6%–2.1%/year over 6 years. These findings are in contrast to the expected age-related declines in fitness over time. Conclusion: The positive long-term benefits on CRF and muscle strength in females provide initial preliminary support for maintenance-based CR, especially given that this population is commonly under-researched and under-represented in the CR literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".