MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3215214143 · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.751866

Global Transcriptome and Coexpression Network Analyses Reveal New Insights Into Somatic Embryogenesis in Hybrid Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua × Liquidambar formosana)

2021· article· en· W3215214143 on OpenAlexaff
Shuaizheng Qi, Ruirui Zhao, Jichen Yan, Yingming Fan, Chao Huang, Hongxuan Li, Siyuan Chen, Ting Zhang, Lisheng Kong, Jian Zhao, Jinfeng Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Plant Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant tissue culture and regeneration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Forestry and Grassland Administration
KeywordsBiologySomatic embryogenesisTranscriptomeTranscription factorGeneCell biologyGeneticsAuxinCallusSomatic cellGene expressionEmbryogenesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Somatic embryogenesis (SE) is a process of somatic cells that dedifferentiate to totipotent embryonic stem cells and generate embryos in vitro . Despite recent scientific headway in deciphering the difficulties of somatic embryogenesis, the overall picture of key genes, pathways, and co-expression networks regulating SE is still fragmented. Therefore, deciphering the molecular basis of somatic embryogenesis of hybrid sweetgum remains pertinent. In the present study, we analyzed the transcriptome profiles and gene expression regulation changes via RNA sequencing from three distinct developmental stages of hybrid sweetgum: non-embryogenic callus (NEC), embryogenic callus (EC), and redifferentiation. Comparative transcriptome analysis showed that 19,957 genes were differentially expressed in ten pairwise comparisons of SE. Among these, plant hormone signaling-related genes, especially the auxin and cytokinin signaling components, were significantly enriched in NEC and EC early. The K-means method was used to identify multiple transcription factors, including HB-WOX, B3-ARF, AP2/ERF , and GRFs (growth regulating factors). These transcription factors showed distinct stage- or tissue-specific expression patterns mirroring each of the 12 superclusters to which they belonged. For example, the WOX transcription factor family was expressed only at NEC and EC stages, ARF transcription factor was expressed in EC early, and GRFs was expressed in late SE. It was noteworthy that the AP2/ERF transcription factor family was expressed during the whole SE process, but almost not in roots, stems and leaves. A weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was used in conjunction with the gene expression profiles to recognize the genes and modules that may associate with specific tissues and stages. We constructed co-expression networks and revealed 22 gene modules. Four of these modules with properties relating to embryonic potential, early somatic embryogenesis, and somatic embryo development, as well as some hub genes, were identified for further functional studied. Through a combination analysis of WGCNA and K-means, SE-related genes including AUX22, ABI3, ARF3, ARF5, AIL1, AIL5, AGL15, WOX11, WOX9, IAA29, BBM1, MYB36, LEA6, SMR4 and others were obtained, indicating that these genes play an important role in the processes underlying the progression from EC to somatic embryos (SEs) morphogenesis. The transcriptome information provided here will form the foundation for future research on genetic transformation and epigenetic control of plant embryogenesis at a molecular level. In follow-up studies, these data could be used to construct a regulatory network for SE; Key genes obtained from coexpression network analysis at each critical stage of somatic embryo can be considered as potential candidate genes to verify these networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Plant ScienceSame topicPlant tissue culture and regenerationFrench-language works237,207