MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3215392260 · doi:10.51742/pelita.v2ii.297

PENGARUH KEBUTUHAN AIR BERSIH TERHADAP JUMLAH PENDUDUK PULAU KARIMUN BESAR (STUDI: PDAM TIRTA KARIMUN)

2021· article· id· W3215392260 on OpenAlexaff
Tiuridah Silitonga, Riko Rizal

Bibliographic record

VenueJURNAL PELITA KOTA · 2021
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal Management and Development
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Masalah penyediaan air bersih saat ini menjadi permasalahan yang sangat serius di pulau Karimun besar. Kebutuhan air bersih tiap tahun mengalami peningkatan sedangkan ketersediaan air bersih semakin terbatas, dikarenakan semakin sempitnya daerah serapan, eksploitasi sumber air baku yang tidak memperhatikan kelestarian sumber air dan jumlah debit air waduk yang dipengaruhi oleh iklim. PDAM Tirta Karimun merupakan institusi yang bertanggung jawab dalam penyediaan air bersih. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis pengaruh kebutuhan air bersih terhadap jumlah penduduk dan kawasan penampungan air waduk sei bati sudah sesuai dengan perencanaan Tata Ruang Wilayah Kabupaten Karimun. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif yaitu dalam penelitian kuantitatif digunakan uji static dengan bantuan software SPSS. Dan hasil penelitian menunjukan adanya pengaruh yang signifikan kebutuhan air bersih terhadap jumlah penduduk di Pulau Karimun Besar. Hal ini terlihat dari uji F dan uji T, dimana hasil analisis uji statistic didapati F hitung > F table (34,309 > 3,416), untuk uji T, hasil analisis data didapati T hitung > T table (5,857 > 3,195)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJURNAL PELITA KOTASame topicCoastal Management and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207