MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 11924: Guiding Strategies in Tricuspid Edge-to-Edge Intervention

2021· article· en· W3215467445 on OpenAlexaff
T. Ruf, Walid Ben Ali, Patrick Gerdes, Jaqueline G. da Rocha e Silva, Felix Kreidel, Alexander Tamm, Martin Geyer, Thomas Muenzel, Ralph Stephan von Bardeleben

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluoroscopyMedicineRegurgitation (circulation)RadiologyNuclear medicineCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Echocardiographical guiding gains further importance as transcatheter interventions for heart valve diseases advance. In transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for tricuspid regurgitation (TEER-TR), the use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) employing biplane imaging with views perpendicular to the inflow-outflow-view is suggested. However, robust data on echocardiographical guiding in this setting is lacking, as well as on the role of fluoroscopy settings. Hypothesis: The aim of the study was to evaluate different guiding-approaches and fluoroscopy settings in TEER-TR procedures. Methods: We retrospectively assessed the effect of different echocardiographical guiding strategies and fluoroscopy angulations on immediate TR reduction (ΔTR), and device time in the TEER-TR interventions. Echocardiographical guiding was rated using a new quality scoring system, MACES 3 . Results: From July 2016 to December 2019 a total of 190 cases of TEER-TR procedures were conducted. In all but 2, the procedure was successfully completed. Device deployment was achieved using transesophageal imaging in 65 cases (n[mid-esophageal]=47, (midE); n[deep-esophageal]=18, (deepE)), while live-MPR was employed 4 times. The transgastric en-face view (TG) constituted the grasping view 119 times (Fig. 1). The best imaging quality with the highest MACES 3 scores were observed in deepE and TG. MACES 3 scores significantly influenced the acute outcome. In cases of secondary TR, the use of TG was superior to other imaging in achieving a ΔTR of ≥ 2 grades. Both the use of TG and special fluoroscopy alignment significantly reduced the device time. Conclusions: TEER-TR can be effectively guided using different echocardiographic strategies. To strive for the best imaging quality clearly increases procedural success. Using the TG approach offers benefits in immediate procedural result and device time, with the latter further reduced using fluoroscopic alignment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments→French-language works237,207→