Systematics of smectite hydrogen-isotope composition: Structural hydrogen versus adsorbed water
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Atmospheric water adsorbed onto clay mineral surfaces, of smectite group minerals in particular, can contaminate hydrogen released from structural hydroxyl groups during hydrogen-isotope analysis. Interlayer cation composition and cation hydration enthalpy, in particular, can affect the magnitude of this excess hydrogen yield and hence the hydrogen isotope composition (δ2H) of smectites. To evaluate this problem, δ2H of different cation-saturated (Ca2+, Na+, K+), dried forms of six smectite standards from the Clay Minerals Society Source Clays were measured using a modified sample drying and on-line High-Temperature-Conversion-Elemental-Analysis (TCEA) Continuous-Flow-Isotope-Ratio-Mass-Spectrometry (CF-IRMS) protocol. More negative interlayer cation hydration enthalpies (Ca2+ > Na+ > K+) led to higher residual adsorbed water contents, which produced poorer δ2H reproducibility for the determination of smectite hydroxyl hydrogen. The lowest adsorbed water contribution and the most reproducible and possibly accurate δ2H for smectite hydroxyl hydrogen was obtained for K-saturated smectites dried for both 4 and 24 h at 220 °C prior to isotopic analysis and transferred to a “Zero-Blank” autosampler in ≤2.5 min. This approach provided the lowest measurement error for hydroxyl δ2H and facilitated much greater sample throughput than classical methods for smectitic clays. This study proposes a protocol for hydroxyl δ2H determination in smectitic clay minerals, and reveals the effect of H-isotope fractionation of adsorbed water during sample preparation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it