MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3215590078 · doi:10.1101/2021.12.01.470582

Cerebrovascular insulin receptors are defective in Alzheimerˈs disease

2021· preprint· en· W3215590078 on OpenAlexaff
M. Leclerc, Philippe Bourassa, Cyntia Tremblay, Vicky Caron, Camille Sugère, Vincent Émond, David A. Bennett, Frédéric Calon

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInsulin-degrading enzymeInsulin receptorInsulin resistanceInsulinInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicineBlood–brain barrierBiologyCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Central response to insulin is suspected to be defective in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but its localization in the brain remains unknown. While most insulin is secreted in the bloodstream by the pancreas, how it interacts with the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to alter brain function remains poorly defined. Here, we show that human and murine cerebral insulin receptors (INSR), particularly the long isoform INSRα-B, are concentrated in microvessels rather than in the parenchyma. Vascular concentrations of INSRα-B were lower in the parietal cortex of subjects diagnosed with AD, positively correlating with cognitive scores, leading to a shift toward a higher INSRα-A/B ratio, consistent with cerebrovascular insulin resistance in the AD brain. Vascular INSRα was inversely correlated with β-amyloid (Aβ) plaques and β-site APP cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1), but positively correlated with insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE), neprilysin and ABCB1. Using brain cerebral intracarotid perfusion, we found that the transport rate of insulin across the BBB remained very low (<0.03 µl.g -1 .s -1 ) and was not inhibited by an INSR antagonist. However, intracarotid perfusion of insulin induced the phosphorylation of INSRβ which was restricted to microvessels. Such an activation of vascular INSR was blunted in 3xTg-AD mice, suggesting that AD neuropathology induces insulin resistance at the level of the BBB. Overall, the present data in postmortem AD brains and an animal model of AD indicate that defects in the INSR localized at the BBB strongly contribute to brain insulin resistance in AD, in association with Aβ pathology. Highlights Circulating insulin activates brain insulin receptors in microvessels. BBB INSR contribute to cerebral insulin resistance in AD. Cognitive impairment in AD is associated with a loss of cerebrovascular INSRα-B. Loss of isoform INSRα-B is associated with increased BACE1 activity. Summary Leclerc et al. show that circulating insulin activates cerebral insulin receptor localized on the blood-brain-barrier level (BBB), not in the parenchyma. Experiments with human brain samples and animal models provide evidence that INSR at the BBB are impaired in Alzheimer’s disease, thereby contributing to brain insulin resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→