Abstract 14073: Deterioration of Functional Status and Timing of Intervention in Patients With Aortic Stenosis: Results From the PROGRESSA Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: The assessment of changes in functional status during follow-up is critical to determine the timing of intervention in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Fast progression of AS (annualized progression of peak jet velocity [V peak ] ≥30 cm/s) is among the risk markers recommended in the guidelines to trigger early intervention in asymptomatic severe AS. We investigated the association between the progression of AS hemodynamic severity and the change in functional status during follow-up of patients with asymptomatic mild to moderate AS. Methods: 285 patients with AS prospectively recruited in the PROGRESSA study (NCT01679431) were included in this analysis. Functional status was evaluated using the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification. Results: Baseline NYHA class was similar (class I, II, III: 57%, 41%, 2% versus 58%, 41%, 1%; p=0.75) between patients with moderate (V peak progression ≥12 cm/s/year; median of cohort) versus those with slow AS progression rate. During a mean follow-up of 3.9±2.4 years, patients with moderate AS progression rate had larger increase in NYHA class compared to those with slow progression (+0.13±0.48 versus +0.01±0.21 class/year; p=0.008). From baseline to 2 years, a significant worsening of NYHA class occurred but only in the moderate AS progression group ( Figure ). In multivariable analysis, AS progression rate remained significantly associated with the change in NYHA class (p=0.04).A total of 156 clinical events (110 AVR and 46 deaths) occurred during a mean follow-up of 1.1±1.5 years after the last echocardiographic visit. Patients with ≥1 class increase in NYHA (n=70) had significantly higher risk of events (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.75 [95% CI: 1.12-2.75]; p=0.01). Conclusions: In this prospective cohort of patients with mild to moderate AS at baseline, the decline in functional status occurs early in the course of the disease and is in large part determined by the progression rate of AS hemodynamic severity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".