MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3215641558 · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-153262

Tisagenlecleucel Therapy Is Safe and Effective for Children with Down Syndrome with ALL in First Relapse

2021· article· en· W3215641558 on OpenAlexaffabout
Joerg Krueger, Johann Hitzler, Stéphanie Mourad, Mylène Bassal, Elizabeth Cairney, Bruce Crooks, Angela Punnett, Sarah Alexander, Muhammad Ali, Henrique Bittencourt, James A. Whitlock, Sumit Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineLondon Health Sciences CentreMontreal Children's HospitalIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePopulationBlinatumomabHematopoietic stem cell transplantationPediatricsCumulative incidenceChimeric antigen receptorTransplantationCytokine release syndromeIncidence (geometry)Internal medicineOncologyLeukemiaLymphoblastic LeukemiaImmunotherapyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Children with Down Syndrome (DS) have a 20-fold increased incidence of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and a 70% higher risk of relapse than children with ALL and no DS. Treatment for DS children with relapsed ALL is challenging due to the high treatment-related mortality associated with both intensive chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) as well as high rates of second relapse. Outcomes for relapsed ALL in DS are dismal, with recent studies citing an event-free survival (EFS) as low as 17%. Alternative treatment approaches are needed for this patient population. Treatment with anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CARTs) have shown high remission rates in patients with multiple relapsed/refractory ALL with an acceptable safety profile. CARTs are generally not indicated for first relapse of ALL; DS-specific indications for CARTs do not exist. In Ontario, due to the specific susceptibility of children with DS-ALL, CARTs were made available to this population upon first relapse. We describe the population-based Canadian experience using CARTs for first relapse of DS-ALL. Methods: Efficacy and safety data on all children referred for CARTs at the Hospital for Sick Children, in Toronto, Canada were retrospectively collected in a central database and validated by treating clinicians. Here we report all patients with DS suffering a first relapse of ALL at age <18 years referred for commercially available CARTs (tisagenlecleucel) between 2019 and 2021. Results: Five patients with DS received tisagenlecleucel for first relapse of ALL during the study period. Median age at original diagnosis was 6.3 years (range 3.4-11.5). Four patients presenting with National Cancer Institute (NCI) standard risk and one with NCI high-risk disease were initially treated on Children's Oncology Group based protocols. Four patients presented with relapse >36 months from diagnosis and one patient with early relapse. Mononuclear cells were successfully collected for all patients on the first attempt. Patients were bridged from collection to infusion with low intensity chemotherapy regimens. Tisagenlecleucel was successfully manufactured for all patients and infused at a median of 69 days (range 56-101) from collection of T cells. Four patients developed CRS: two patients grade 1, one patient grade 2, and one patient grade 4 requiring ICU care and treatment with tocilizumab and steroid. All patients achieved minimal residual disease (MRD) negative remission one month after infusion, with B-cell aplasia. Two patients showed early (< 6months post infusion) B-cell recovery consistent with CAR T-cell loss; both received off-label reinfusions of tisagenlecleucel and again achieved B-cell aplasia. One patient had a seizure with the first Fludarabine dose of lymphodepleting (LD) chemotherapy for re-infusion and was found to have elevated intracranial pressure. After treatment with Topiramate and anti-seizure prophylaxis the patient tolerated LD chemotherapy without further neurological events. No patient received further ALL therapy; none went on to HSCT. One patient suffered a CD19-negative relapse 7 months post infusion and was transitioned to palliative-intent treatment. Two patients developed prolonged neutropenia with one patient showing recovery (ANC>1x10E9/l) at 5 months post infusion and the patient who had relapsed disease remained neutropenic until relapse. Infectious complications in the first 6 months post infusion were rare. One patient, who was not neutropenic, required two hospital admissions for line related sepsis. With a median follow-up time of 519 days (range 197-785), the 1-year estimated EFS and overall survival were both 80% (95 th confidence interval 52-100%; Figure 1). Conclusions: Tisagenlecleucel was safe and effective in a small cohort of children with DS and first relapse of CD19+ ALL, with achievement of long-term remissions without further therapy, and an EFS superior to that seen in historical cohorts. Rate of acute complications were not increased compared with reported outcomes in patients without DS. Further evaluation of tisagenlecleucel in this setting is warranted. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Krueger: KITE/Gilead: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; SOBI: Consultancy. Whitlock: Sobi Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Amgen; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Gupta: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: tisagenlecleucel for early B-cell recovery

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207