MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3215700545 · doi:10.5610/jaee.21.5_161

Analysis of Correlation Coefficients between Two Orthogonal Components of Strong-Motion Records

2021· article· en· W3215700545 on OpenAlexaff
Makoto Takao, H. Sato

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorrelationMotion (physics)MathematicsGeologyGeometryPhysicsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

我が国の原子力施設の耐震設計において応答スペクトルに基づく方法で入力地震動を作成する場合,水平成分については1つの目標応答スペクトルに対し直交する2成分の模擬地震動を作成する.その際,両者の特徴は一様乱数によって与えられた位相のランダム性や観測記録における異なる2成分の位相特性の違いによって区別されている.一方,米国の原子力規制委員会の基準では,3成分を同時入力して原子力施設等の地震応答解析を実施する場合は,入力する3成分が互いに統計的に独立であることを示すべきとされており,基準値としてChen (1975)による相関係数の絶対値を導入している.本論文では,Chen (1975)による相関係数に着目して,我が国の2000年以降の強震動加速度記録を対象に直交2成分間の相関係数を求め,統計処理を行うとともに地震に関する各種パラメータが相関係数に与える影響を分析した.また,一般的な応答スペクトルに基づく方法により模擬地震動を作成した上で相関係数を解析した.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Japan Association for Earthquake EngineeringSame topicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchFrench-language works237,207