GRACE-FO and Swarm accelerometers: An optimal approach for processing non-gravitational acceleration measurements.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
GRACE-FO (GFO) and Swarm are two LEO missions that, among others, provide non-gravitational acceleration measurements required for geopotential model development and modelling of non-gravitational forces acting upon them. Unfortunately, the performance of the accelerometers on board for both missions is not the expected. Measurements from both missions present dominant bias jumps that occur on all accelerometer axes and they have been linked to the satellites’ entrance to and exit from the Earth’s shadow. These jumps are estimated and corrected at Level 1A of GFO C and at Level 2 of Swarm C in an optimal way using Least Squares methodology. The corresponding variances of the jumps are also calculated. Furthermore, the measurements contain spurious signals and dominant spikes mostly connected with thruster activation, mainly in the equatorial region or high temperature sensitivity. These disturbances have a significant impact on the data analysis. We propose an alternative weighting filter methodology to generate Level 1B data from Level 1A for GFO C that includes the attenuated spikes and their corresponding variances and does not involve the removal of the spikes nor does it include any interpolation to fill data gaps. This methodology is used for Swarm C accelerometer Level 2 dataset as well. Using spectral domain methods, we show that the newly generated GFO Level 1B and Swarm Level 2 data are not contaminated by the presence of spikes and data jumps. In the polar regions, mostly at the South pole, spikes in the measurements are connected to magnetic disturbances when the satellites enter these regions. Our proposed methodology contains an optimal and unbiased dataset of non-gravitational acceleration measurements that can be used for the estimation of geopotential models and also for the investigation of the accelerometer’s response to electromagnetic disturbances and the modelling of other non-gravitational accelerations to derive thermospheric neutral densities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".