The influence of Nordic walking on the general functioning and cognitive performance of patients with Alzheimer’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Most studies show that physical activity (PA) can inhibit the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). This research aimed to investigate the effect of 3-month moderate PA on the general functioning and cognitive abilities of AD patients. Methods: The study included 32 patients with mild or moderate AD who scored 11-23 points in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Half of the participants were qualified to perform the exercises; the other half constituted the control group. The recommended form of activity was Nordic walking, 30 minutes, 3 days a week, for 3 months, under the supervision of the patient's carer. General functioning and the severity of cognitive deficits were assessed using the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale (MoCA) before and after the 3-month study. Results: No improvement was observed in the overall functioning of the patients after 3 months of regular, moderate PA. Neither were there any differences in this respect between the active and inactive groups, both in patients with mild (MMSE 19-23) and moderate (MMSE 11-18) disease severity. Men showed a deterioration in overall functioning regardless of PA. No differences in cognitive functioning were observed between the active and inactive groups, the two genders or between mild (MMSE 19-23) and moderate (MMSE 11-18) subjects. Conclusions: The 3-month, moderate, Nordic walking PA did not improve the overall general functioning or cognitive performance in patients with mild or moderate AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".