MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3215899855 · doi:10.1684/epd.2021.1373

Knowledge gaps for functional outcomes after multilobar resective and disconnective pediatric epilepsy surgery: Conference Proceedings of the Patient‐Centered Stakeholder Meeting 2019

2022· article· en· W3215899855 on OpenAlex
Monika Jones, William B. Harris, Μ. Scott Perry, Marlene Behrmann, Joanna A. Christodoulou, Aria Fallah, Bryan Kolb, Frank E. Musiek, Lynn K. Paul, Klajdi Puka, Cynthia F. Salorio, Raman Sankar, Mary Lou Smith, Ahsan Moosa Naduvil Valappil, Patricia D. Walshaw, Howard L. Weiner, Raymond Woo, Philip Zeitler, Taylor J. Abel

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEpileptic Disorders · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoWestern UniversityUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersEpilepsy SocietyPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
KeywordsEpilepsyEpilepsy surgeryStakeholderMultidisciplinary approachMedicinePatient-centered outcomesBest practicePsychologyMedical educationPsychiatryNursingPublic relationsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For children with medication-resistant epilepsy who undergo multilobar or hemispheric surgery, the goal of achieving seizure freedom is met with a variety of potential functional consequences, both favorable and unfavorable. However, there is a paucity of literature that comprehensively addresses the cognitive, medical, behavioral, orthopedic, and sensory outcomes across the lifespan following large epilepsy surgeries in childhood, leaving all stakeholders underinformed with regard to counseling and expectations. Through collaboration between clinicians, researchers, and patient/caregiver stakeholders, the "Functional Impacts of Large Resective or Disconnective Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery: Identifying Gaps and Setting PCOR Priorities" meeting was convened on July 18, 2019, to identify gaps in knowledge and inform various patient-centered research initiatives. Clinicians and researchers with content expertise presented the best available data in each functional domain which is summarized here. As a result of the meeting, the top three consensus priorities included research focused on postoperative: (1) hydrocephalus; (2) mental health issues; and (3) literacy and other educational outcomes. The proceedings of this meeting mark the first time research on functional outcomes after resective and disconnective pediatric epilepsy surgery has been codified and shared among multidisciplinary stakeholders. This joint initiative promotes continued collaboration in the field and ensures that advancements align with actual patient and family needs and experiences. Collaboration around common objectives will lead to better informed counseling around postoperative expectations and management for children undergoing epilepsy surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.695

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it