Perovskite luminescent solar concentrators for photovoltaics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As large-area photon collection devices designed for photovoltaics, luminescent solar concentrators (LSCs) have been proposed for more than 40 years. In recent years, the perovskite-based LSCs have received much interest for the convenient preparation process and low cost along with high quantum yields of perovskite luminophores. However, optical losses, such as non-radiative recombination loss and reabsorption loss, seriously impair the performance of LSCs and further impede the commercialization of such promising photovoltaic devices. Various strategies, such as increasing the Stokes shift and defect passivation, have been implemented to enhance the optical performance in perovskite-based LSCs. Here, we appraise the applications of perovskite luminophores in LSCs and review the typical preparation method of perovskite-based LSCs. The state-of-the-art solutions are presented to address the optical losses, leading to the demonstration of enabling high-performance perovskite-based LSCs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it