MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 13111: Circulating Extracellular Microvesicles: Mediators of Altitude-Related Vascular Inflammation

2021· article· en· W3216036336 on OpenAlexaffabout
Madden Brewster, Anthony R. Bain, Vinícius P. Garcia, Noah M. DeSouza, Michael M. Tymko, Philip N. Ainslie, Christopher A. DeSouza

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHigh Altitude and Hypoxia
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrovesiclesMedicineInflammationExtracellularExtracellular vesiclesImmunologyCell biologymicroRNABiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ascent to high altitude can adversely affect cardio- and cerebrovascular health, particularly in those with pre-existing disease. Pathologic vascular responses to acute and subacute high altitude exposure include, endothelial dysfunction, cerebral and pulmonary edema as well as pulmonary hypertension. Changes in vascular endothelial cell function, most notably the induction of a proinflammatory endothelial phenotype, is thought to be an underlying factor. Endothelial inflammation can induce cerebral edema in stroke and promote pulmonary edema. The mechanisms underlying high-altitude related vascular inflammation remain unclear. The vascular endothelium is significantly influenced by circulating cell-derived microvesicles (MVs). MVs are small (100-1000 nm) membrane vesicles that are released by various cell types (e.g. endothelial, platelets, leukocytes) in response to a myriad of physiologic and pathologic stimuli including hypoxia. Circulating MVs have emerged as biomarkers and mediators of endothelial inflammation. We tested the hypothesis that ascent to high altitude induces a proinflammatory circulating MV phenotype. Ten healthy adults (8 M/2 F; age: 28 + 2 yr ) residing at sea level (Kelowna, BC, Canada) were studied prior to and 4-6 days after ascending to high altitude (Cerro de Pasco, Peru; 4300 m). Circulating MVs were isolated, enumerated and collected from plasma by flow cytometry. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells were cultured and treated with MVs collected from each subject at sea level and altitude. Circulating MVs were significantly higher at altitude vs sea level (26637 + 3315 vs19388 + 1699 MV/μL). Altitude-related MVs induced higher (~25%; P<0.05) release of interleukin (IL)-6 (63.9±3.9 vs 53.3±3.6 pg/mL) and IL-8 (140.2±3.6 vs 120.7±3.8 pg/mL) compared with MVs harvested at sea level. Although intracellular expression of total NF-κB p65 (83.4 + 6.7 vs 90.2 + 6.9 AU) was not significantly affected, high altitude-MVs resulted in ~55% higher (P<0.05) cell expression of p-NF-κB p65 (active NF-κB: 129.6 + 19.8 vs 90.7 + 10.5 AU) than sea level-MVs. Circulating extracellular MVs increase at high altitude and induce endothelial inflammation, potentially contributing to altitude-related vascular pathologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicHigh Altitude and HypoxiaFrench-language works237,207