MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 11692: High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin and the Efficacy of Dapagliflozin in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: An Analysis of the DAPA-HF Trial

2021· article· en· W3216042908 on OpenAlexaff
David D. Berg, Marc S. Sabatine, Naveed Sattar, Petr Jarolı́m, Paul Welsh, Pardeep S. Jhund, Inder S. Anand, Rudolf A. de Boer, Mikhail Kosiborod, Eileen O’Meara, Ann Hammarstedt, Anna Maria Langkilde, Daniel Lindholm, Mikaela Sjöstrand, John J.V. McMurray, David A. Morrow

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEjection fractionHeart failureInternal medicineCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Circulating high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hsTnT) reflects myocardial injury, and higher levels are associated with an increased risk of worsening heart failure (HF) and death in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Dapagliflozin reduces the rate of worsening HF or cardiovascular death in patients with HFrEF. The effect of dapagliflozin on the risk of worsening HF or CV death in relation to baseline concentration of hsTnT in patients with HFrEF is unknown. Methods: DAPA-HF was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of dapagliflozin (10 mg once daily) in patients with New York Heart Association class II, III, or IV HF and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%. We measured hsTnT (Roche Diagnostics) at baseline in 3,138 patients randomized in DAPA-HF and at one year among 2,500 survivors. The primary outcome was adjudicated worsening HF or cardiovascular death. Secondary outcomes included each component individually, hospitalization for HF, and death from any cause. The median follow-up was 18.2 months. Results: By the time of this presentation, data will be available for presentation of the distribution of baseline hsTnT concentration and the clinical characteristics associated with strata of hsTnT concentration. The association between baseline hsTnT and 2-year outcomes will be presented and adjusted for potential confounders, including age, sex, eGFR, history of diabetes mellitus, and principal cause of HF (ischemic or non-ischemic). The effect of dapagliflozin on the change in hsTnT concentration from baseline to one year will be presented. The effect of dapagliflozin on the primary and secondary outcomes (both absolute and relative risk reductions) stratified by baseline hsTnT concentration will be analyzed. Conclusions: Biomarkers of myocardial injury identify patients with HFrEF at heightened risk of adverse outcomes. This analysis from a large, international, randomized, placebo-controlled trial will provide a robust assessment of the effect of dapagliflozin on hsTnT and the ability of dapagliflozin to improve outcomes in relation to baseline hsTnT concentration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health→French-language works237,207→