MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3216139888 · doi:10.51985/jbumdc2018003

Circumcision in patients with bleeding disorders: Can it be done safely?

2018· article· en· W3216139888 on OpenAlex
Huma Faiz Halepota, Ahmad Vaqas Faruque, Muhammad Sohail Arshad

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bahria University Medical and Dental College · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenital Health and Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThrombastheniaGlanzmann's thrombastheniaSurgeryPediatricsPlateletInternal medicinePlatelet aggregation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: The purpose of our study was to review outcome of circumcision among children with bleeding disorders at our institution and also to determine the impact of optimization leading to safe circumcision. Methods: Data representing boys (age 0-16 years) who underwent routine circumcision at the Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) between1988-2014 was retrospectively reviewed. Children with bleeding disorder were identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) Code 64.0. Data was retrieved and confidentially was maintained. SPSS version 19 was used for statistical analysis. Results: During 26 years 13,200 circumcisions were performed at AKUH. Amongst these 8,463 (64.11%) were done by using Plastibell, while 4,737 (35.88%) by open slit method. Only 23 (0.17%) children were identified with bleeding disorder. Two groups were made, Group-A (n:15) children with known bleeding disorders having circumcision and GroupB, (n:8) those in whom bleeding disorder was diagnosed after circumcision. Median age of children in Group-A was 9 years. All children in Group-A underwent open circumcision. 10 patients had Factor VIII deficiency, 2 had Glanzmann’s thrombasthenia, 1 had Factor IX deficiency, 1 had Quebec platelet disorder, and 1 had Von Willebrand disorder. Median age of children in Group-B was 3 months. 7 out of 8 underwent plastibell while one had circumcision by open technique. 7 were diagnosed as Factor VIII deficiency and 1 diagnosed later to have Glanzmann's thrombasthenia. Statistical analysis showed significant difference among these two groups’ p-value with respect to age (p-value 0.00) and family history (p-value 0.04- Fisher’s exact test). Both groups had similar postoperative length of stay. Overall bleeding complication rate after optimization was 13.33%. Conclusion: With the help of hematologist and adequate Factor replacement, these children can be managed as daycare. We suggest risks and benefit should be discussed with parents before procedure

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.281

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it