Determination of the Average Specific Capital Consumptions of CCPP with Gas Turbine of 30-125 MW and Put into Operation at TPPs of the Russian Federation from 2015 to the First Quarter of 2021
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Research was carried out on the volume of gas turbine commissioning in the range of unit capacities of 30–125 MW at TPPs of the Russian Federation operating as part of a CCPP in the period from 2015 to the first quarter of 2021. The purpose of the research was to determine the average specific capital investment in construction and the average specific fuel consumption for the supply of electricity and heat for the CCPP introduced over the years in the united energy systems of the Russian Federation. Gas turbines are classified by electrical capacity into three groups: from 100 to 125 MW, from 60 to 99 MW and from 30 to 59 MW. An assessment of the quantitative distribution of gas turbines over the interconnected energy systems of the Russian Federation has been carried out. The results of the comparison of the quantitative commissioning of gas turbines are shown in the period from 2010 to the economic crisis of 2014 and in the period from 2015 to the present. A preliminary estimate of the increase in average specific capital investments in the construction of CCPP, which included gas turbines of the same electric power, was made for these periods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".