MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Biodiversity in Canadian Dairy: Uncovering Opportunities for Meaningful Change in the Canadian Dairy Industry’s Environmental Stewardship

2020· article· en· W3216180654 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jeff Reichheld and Emily Sousa

Bibliographic record

VenueRural Review Ontario Rural Planning Development and Policy · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicOrganic Food and Agriculture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStewardship (theology)BiodiversityDairy industryEnvironmental stewardshipBusinessEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental planningGeographyEnvironmental sciencePolitical scienceEcologyBiologyFood science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research seeks to understand Canadian dairy farmers’ motivations for incorporating or not biodiversity into their farms. It is widely understood that yield, and especially farm-level sustainability, can be improved by incorporating biodiversity at the farm level because it increases ecosystem health and resilience. But, biodiversity and ecosystem services are not clearly connected in the literature to larger environmental repairs. This project began with a national survey of Canadian dairy farmers, focusing on implementation of biodiversity, and barriers impeding implementation. We are currently pursuing case studies of selected farms to examine the reasons for and outcomes of incorporating biodiversity practices. We expect to find that not adopting biodiversity practices will be tied to implementation costs, combined with anticipated reduction in profit. However, Merchant (2003), suggests that we will also discover underlying cultural values and beliefs about control over land and the right to individual profit contributing to this resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.406
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRural Review Ontario Rural Planning Development and PolicySame topicOrganic Food and AgricultureFrench-language works237,207