Abstract 10996: Predictors of Surgical Reintervention Before Bidirectional Cavopulmonary Shunt in Children with Single Ventricle Physiology Who Underwent Main Pulmonary Artery Banding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Unplanned intervention before stage 2 palliation (S2P) in patients with single ventricle (SV) lesions with dual unobstructed outflows palliated with pulmonary artery banding (PAB) is common. The factors contributing to intervention and its association with successfully undergoing S2P are unclear. Hypothesis: Early intervention is more common when PAB is placed at a younger age and with a lower initial PAB pressure gradient. Methods: Retrospective single center study of patients with SV lesions undergoing PAB between Jan 2000 and Dec 2020. Association with reintervention and successful S2P was modeled using exploratory cause-specific hazard regression. A multivariable model was developed adjusting for clinical and statistically relevant predictors. The cumulative proportion of patients undergoing intervention were summarized using a competing risk model. Results: A total of 77 patients - 53% female, 86% term and 12% syndromic - underwent PAB at median (IQR) 47 (24-66) days and 3.73 (3.2-4.5) kg. Within 18 months of PAB, 60 (78%) reached S2P, 9 (12%) died, 1 (1%) transplanted and 7 (9%) were alive without S2P. Intervention occurred in 18 (23%) prior to S2P (10/18) or death (4/18); 16 (21 %) occurred within 6 months of PAB. Intervention included PAB adjustment (n=7), conversion to DKS/BTT shunt (n=5), balloon atrial septostomy (n=4) and addition of a BTT shunt (n=2). Repeat intervention was required in 4 patients. Intervention was associated with genetic syndrome (p= 0.03) and lower weight at PAB (p=0.02) but not with age at PAB, pre/postoperative oxygen saturation, PAB length or gradient. Presence of genetic syndrome was the only risk factor associated with not reaching S2P (p=0.02). Conclusions: Intervention is common following PAB and associated with presence of genetic disorder or smaller patient size. Children with genetic syndrome aiming to undergo S2P are at higher risk for intervention and death and may benefit from alternate treatment strategy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".