Abstract P394: Angiotensin-(1-7) Attenuates Diastolic Dysfunction And Cardiac Remodeling In Murine Model Of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a global public health epidemic that accounts for half of the heart failure cases. Various therapeutic approaches have been tested to block the activation of the Renin-Angiotensin System (RAS), including AT1R blockers (ARBs), Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (ACEi), and direct renin inhibitors (DRIs) with modest to negligible benefits. The discovery of ACE2, a novel homolog of ACE, has advanced our understanding of the RAS. ACE2 is a monocarboxypeptidase that degrades Ang II into Ang-(1-7), which works via the activation of the Mas receptor. It has been well understood that the actions of Ang-(1-7) attenuate cardiac remodeling, production of ROS, and cardiac fibrosis. Objective: To determine the therapeutic role of Ang-(1-7) in HFpEF and identify the molecular mechanism related to its action. Methods and Results: To generate a murine model of HFpEF, male WT mice (n=24) were subjected to HFD in addition to eNOS inhibition with L-NAME (0.5 g l-1 in drinking water), as previously described. The control group (n=12) received chow diet and normal tap water. The murine model of HFpEF was validated using the non-invasive transthoracic echocardiography and invasive pressure-volume (PV) loop analyses, which exhibited diastolic dysfunction as well as cardiac hypertrophy. To evaluate the effects of Ang-(1-7) on HFpEF, animals were administered with either saline (n=12) or Ang-(1-7) (n=12) (24 μg/kg/day) for four weeks. Ang-(1-7) treatment improved diastolic function by reducing LVEDP (Ctrl: 8.267±1.254; HFD+L-NAME: 17.64±1.925; Ang-(1-7): 9.100±1.578) and Tau value (Ctrl: 7.365±0.5752; HFD+L-NAME: 9.224±0.3569; Ang-(1-7): 7.381±0.3041). Furthermore, Ang-(1-7) reduced cardiac hypertrophy by reducing the phosphorylation level of MAPK ERK 1/2 (Ctrl: 0.9074±0.1088; HFD+L-NAME: 1.212±0.1369; Ang-(1-7): 0.5615±0.1502) and increasing the phosphorylation level of AMPK (Ctrl: 0.1502±0.1502; HFD+L-NAME: 0.6127±0.06414; Ang-(1-7): 0.7852±0.1006). Ang-(1-7) treatment also reduces cardiomyocytes’ size and decreases interstitial fibrosis, as indicated by WGA and PSR staining. Conclusion: Ang-(1-7) treatment attenuated the development of HFD+L-NAME-induced HFpEF, reduced cardiac hypertrophy, and improved metabolic function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".