MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 11721: FOXK1 is an Essential Transcriptional and Epigenetic Regulator of Cardiovascular Development

2021· article· en· W3216233264 on OpenAlexaff
Javier E. Sierra-Pagán, Nikita R. Dsouza, Thijs A Larson, Satyabrata Das, Patricia Stan, Wuming Gong, Mary G. Garry, Daniel J. Garry

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsScience and Technology Awareness Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCell biologyGATA4EpigeneticsHeart developmentTranscription factorRegulatorProgenitor cellBiologyMedicineStem cellImmunologyCancer researchEmbryonic stem cellGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common genetic birth defect and has considerable morbidity and mortality. Therefore, it is essential to define the mechanisms governing the specification and differentiation of mesodermal and cardiac progenitors to develop targeted therapies for CHD. FOXK1 is a forkhead/winged helix transcription factor known to regulate cell cycle kinetics, myogenic stem cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. During development, FOXK1 expression is restricted to mesodermal progenitors, somites and the heart. The role for FOXK1 in the developing heart is unknown and warrants investigation. In the present study, we describe a novel role for FOXK1 as an essential regulator of cardiovascular development. Approach and Results: We used a mouse embryoid body (EB) system to differentiate WT and Foxk1 null ESCs into mesodermal and cardiac progenitor cells. Flow cytometry analysis for FLK1+PDGFRa+ showed that in the absence of FOXK1, the cardiac lineage was significantly affected. Bulk RNAseq analysis of D3 and D5 EBs showed a significant induction of the cardiac molecular program in WT EBs compared to the Foxk1 null EBs. Since forkhead transcription factors have been shown to be important epigenetic regulators (i.e. pioneer factors), we performed ATACseq of D3 and D5 EBs, which showed that the chromatin landscape nearby known important regulators of cardiogenesis (Isl1, Gata4, Hand1, Hand2, etc.) was significantly relaxed in WT EBs compared to Foxk1 null EBs. Furthermore, we demonstrated that in the absence of Foxk1 , cardiac differentiation was markedly impaired by assaying for cTnT expression and cardiac contractility which was essentially absent in Foxk1 null EBs compared to WT EBs at D10 of differentiation. Additionally, using transcriptional, Co-IP and pulldown assays we demonstrated that FOXK1 is an important regulator of Notch and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways during cardiogenesis. These results were further supported as the Foxk1 null embryo was lethal at E9.5 and had perturbed heart development. Conclusions: These results identify FOXK1 as an essential transcriptional and epigenetic regulator of cardiovascular development using EB assays and gene disruption technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCongenital heart defects researchFrench-language works237,207