MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3216303110

Welcome to the Installation: : Package Design for MacEwan's Book of the Year "Foe" by Iain Reid

2021· article· en· W3216303110 on OpenAlexaff
Vik Chu

Bibliographic record

VenueStudent Research Proceedings · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness Strategies and Innovation
Canadian institutionsMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsidePresentation (obstetrics)Visual artsSloganSection (typography)Art historyMedia studiesArtComputer scienceSociologyLiteratureLawPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Foe, author Iain Reid explores a crumbling marriage set in a sci-fi world. This project attempts to bring to life the Installation, a cutting edge space station on which the protagonist, Junior, spends two years as part of a research project. It imagines what a welcome package for Junior could look like when he first arrives: Leaning against a gift box is a greeting card. “Welcome to the Installation, Junior!” He shivers at his name. Rendered in a bold serif font set on a black background, the text is warm and personal. Intended to reflect the success of OuterMore, it sends shivers up his spine instead. The box itself is supple to the touch and ringed by a band of gold. Unaccustomed to such luxury, Junior catches his vacant reflection in the embossed varnish of his name on the lid. It is surprisingly heavy, and he finds himself setting it gingerly aside. “Existence is achievable,” the insert reads. In the same bold weight of the greeting card, the words are meant to inspire, but Junior feels only his back aching. Flipping the card over, OuterMore’s slogan, “Go Farther, Be Better,” is featured under a cross section blueprint of the Installation. Junior is momentarily intrigued by the details. Below them is a list of the included gifts, followed by instructions to expect three more orientation seminars. With a groan, Junior tosses the insert and drops heavily into a chair. How the hell am I supposed to sleep without Hen? Department: Design Faculty Mentor: Constanza Pacher

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.397
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudent Research ProceedingsSame topicBusiness Strategies and InnovationFrench-language works237,207