MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3216341470 · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.11.019

X-Linked Retinoschisis

2021· article· en· W3216341470 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Michalis Georgiou, Lucia Finocchio, Kaoru Fujinami, Yu Fujinami‐Yokokawa, Gianni Virgili, Omar A. Mahroo, Andrew R. Webster, Michel Michaelides

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Macular Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of OphthalmologyUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College LondonMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation TrustAlexander S. Onassis Public Benefit FoundationQueen's University BelfastRetina UKA.G. Leventis FoundationNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchFoundation Fighting BlindnessQueen's UniversityNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer ResearchMoorfields Eye CharityWellcome Trust
KeywordsMedicineRetinoschisisOptometryOphthalmologyRetinal detachmentRetinal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To examine the genetic and clinical features in children and adults with X-linked retinoschisis (XLRS). DESIGN: Single-center consecutive, retrospective, observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Adults and children with molecularly confirmed XLRS followed up between 1999 and 2020. METHODS: Analysis of genetic, clinical, and retinal imaging findings, including OCT and fundus autofluorescence (FAF), cross-sectionally and longitudinally, was performed. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: RS1, variants, type of variants and phenotype correlations, age of onset, complications rates and types, fundoscopy findings, OCT metrics, FAF patterns, correlations including between best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and age, and OCT characteristics. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two male patients were identified harboring 66 retinoschisin 1 variants, with 7 being novel. The mean age at onset was 16.5 years (range, 0-58 years). Seventy-one patients (71/75 [94.7%]) were symptomatic at presentation; all had decreased best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Funduscopy findings were symmetric in 104 patients (104/108 [96.3%]), with the most common finding being macular schisis (82.4%), whereas peripheral retinoschisis was present in 38.9% and macular atrophy was present in 11.1%. Twenty patients (18.5%) demonstrated complications (vitreous hemorrhage, retinal detachment, or both). Mean BCVA was 0.65 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; Snellen equivalent, 20/89) in the right eye and 0.64 logMAR (Snellen equivalent, 20/87) in the left eye. Mean BCVA change over a mean interval of 6.7 years was 0.04 and 0.01 logMAR for right and left eyes, respectively. A normal FAF pattern was identified in 16 of 106 eyes (15.1%); 45 eyes (42.5%) showed a spoke-wheel pattern, 13 eyes (12.3%) showed foveal hyperautofluorescence, and 18 eyes (17.0%) showed a central reduction in signal. In total, 14 patients demonstrated evidence of progression on FAF over time. On OCT, foveoschisis was observed in 172 eyes (172/215 [80%]), parafoveal schisis was observed in 171 eyes (171/215 [79.5%]), and foveal atrophy was observed in 44 eyes (44/215 [20.5%]). Cystoid changes were localized to the inner nuclear layer (172/181 eyes [95%]), the outer nuclear layer (97/181 [53.6%]), and the ganglion cell layer (92/181 [50.8%]). Null variants were associated with worse final BCVA and aforementioned complications. CONCLUSIONS: X-linked retinoschisis is highly phenotypically variable, but with relative foveal and BCVA preservation until late adulthood, allowing more accurate prognostication. The slowly (often minimally) progressive disease course may pose a challenge in identification of early end points for therapeutic trials aimed at altering the kinetics of degeneration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOphthalmologySame topicRetinal and Macular SurgeryFrench-language works237,207