MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3216380927 · doi:10.1121/10.0007512

Relationship between salinity of the liquid and shell composition on the resonance frequency of the C3F8 lipid coated microbubbles

2021· article· en· W3216380927 on OpenAlexaff
Amin Jafarisojahrood, Celina Yang, Claire Counil, Pinuta Nittayacharn, A. l. C. deLeon, Agata A. Exner, David E. Goertz, Michael C. Kolios

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityWestern UniversitySunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrobubblesMaterials scienceResonance (particle physics)UltrasoundSalinityAttenuationShell (structure)CoatingNuclear magnetic resonanceAcousticsOpticsComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lipid-coated microbubbles (MBs) are used in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging and MB enhanced therapeutic ultrasound (US). Understanding the MB behavior and the influence of the surrounding medium on its response to the US is necessary to select the suitable US exposure parameters. The MB lipid coating is often charged, however the influence of the ions in the medium on MB behavior is not fully understood. In this work, the influence of the medium salinity on the pressure-dependent MB behavior is investigated for the first time. MBs of different lipid shell compositions are size isolated to achieve the same size distribution. The MBs linear and pressure-dependent attenuation are measured in deionized water, PBS 1×, PBS 2×, and PBS 10× using a system of aligned PVDF 100% bandwidth transducers with a center frequency of 10 MHz and exposures with peak to peak pressure range of 3–140 kPa. With increasing salinity, the linear resonance frequency decreases up to 50% for conventional lipid shell compositions, and the pressure dependence of the resonance frequency is inhibited. By modifying the shell PEG ratio, the salinity effects can significantly be altered. Moreover, the nonlinear pressure-dependent resonance frequency is restored with applications to increased CEUS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America→Same topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications→French-language works237,207→