A micro/nanofiber antibacterial pad with core–shell structure for cold fresh lamb preservation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, a micro/nanofiber antibacterial pad with a core–shell structure was successfully designed to extend the shelf life of the cold fresh lambs. The micro/nanofiber was prepared by electrostatic spinning using polylactic acid as the shell and Eudragit L 100–55 as the core, and 0.4% (w/w) tea polyphenols (TP) as an antibacterial agent was encapsulated in the core section. Release behavior showed that TP could be effectively protected in an acidic environment to achieve a slow-release effect. The antibacterial experiment revealed that the antibacterial rates of the coaxial antibacterial pad containing 0.4% TP against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus were 73% and 53.88%, respectively. As a result, freshness preservation experiments, using an antibacterial pad with the core–shell structure, could extend the shelf life of the cold fresh lamb. Novelty impact statement The micro/nanofiber antibacterial pad with a core–shell structure was prepared. The antibacterial pad with a core–shell structure could control the slow release of tea polyphenols. The micro/nanofiber antibacterial pad could extend the shelf life of the cold fresh lamb.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".