Anemia and Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a condition typically affecting young, obese women. Although anemia is recognized as a risk factor of IIH from case reports, their relationship remains controversial as several comparative studies showed no significant association. This study aimed to examine the relationship between anemia and IIH. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and grey literature were searched to September 2020. Primary studies on patients with diagnoses of anemia of any kind and IIH were included. Primary outcomes included the total number of cases of anemia and IIH. A meta-analysis on the prevalence of anemia in IIH compared with control patients was conducted. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) was used to rate the quality of evidence. RESULTS: Overall, 62 cases and 5 observational or case-control studies were included. Pooled incidence of anemia in patients with IIH was 195/1,073 (18.2%). Patients with IIH (n = 774) had a significantly higher prevalence of anemia compared with controls (n = 230,981) (RR 1.44 [95% confidence interval 1.08-1.92]). Patients were 67.7% females and had a mean age of 22.4 years. The mean opening pressure was 37.9 cmH2O. Anemia was most commonly caused by iron deficiency (51.6%) and aplastic anemia (19.4%). Most patients (59.7%) showed improvement or resolution with anemia treatment only without intracranial pressure-lowering therapy. Evidence was limited because of high risk of reporting bias from the large number of case reports and case-control studies. CONCLUSIONS: Anemia is significantly more common in IIH compared with control patients, and case reports suggest a direct relationship. Complete blood counts should be considered in all patients with papilledema, particularly in atypical presentations (male, nonobese, nonperipapillary retinal hemorrhages, prominent risk factor for anemia) or in treatment-refractory IIH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".