MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3216581791

ENERGY CONSULTATIONS ON TREATY 8 LANDS: THE EFFECTS OF OIL EXTRACTION ON PEERLESS TROUT FIRST NATION

2022· dissertation· en· W3216581791 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marley Joan Duckett

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicNatural Resources and Economic Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTroutTreatyFisheryExtraction (chemistry)GeographyPolitical scienceLawFish <Actinopterygii>ChemistryBiologyChromatography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For 14 weeks, from May 8th to August 15th of 2015, I lived and conducted research in Peerless Trout First Nation (PTFN). I use ethnographic research methods and a political ecological framework to study how Indigenous culture and traditional use of the land is affected by resource development in northern Alberta. This research contributes to the discipline of anthropology in several ways. First, it demonstrates how ethnography is an important research tool for collecting scientific data. There are several vignettes, stories, and interview excerpts that, through coding methods, inform the themes and conclusions in this thesis. This thesis is a successful demonstration of graduate work in anthropology and can inform, and hopefully inspire other students to pursue this type of education and work. Second, this thesis contributes to the literature on the anthropology of oil. I review many anthropologists, scholars, and authors who speak to development and the economy; specifically in employment concerns for Indigenous groups living near extraction zones which continues to be a key issue in oil discourse. More generally, this thesis contributes to the larger discipline of environmental anthropologists studying oil and gas in that it supports those who also argue that Indigenous worldview, perspectives, and knowledge must be considered in the making, or perhaps, re-making of consultation, and other laws and policies related to extraction and Indigenous groups. Third, this thesis shares key findings that are useful to PTFN and can inform consultation practice and policy in meaningful ways. My key findings indicate that PTFN remains committed to engaging in industry related projects while highly attuned to the negative social and environmental impacts resource extraction creates. Consultation efforts in PTFN are hampered by several factors including problematic consultation policy and practices, Consultation Staff have limited knowledge of the technical and bureaucratic language used in office and administrative work, and there is limited information sharing between Consultation Staff and inadequate transparency from the Consultation Office to the community about projects. A critical review of these processes is necessary for PTFN to move forward in their efforts to effectively participate in the energy sector in Alberta. I offer tangible suggestions to address these critiques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.674
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.160
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicNatural Resources and Economic DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207