Abstract MP216: Identification Of Novel Phosphoprotein Signaling Pathways In Human Dilated Cardiomyopathy By Integrative Proteomic And Phosphoproteomic Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is one of the most common causes of heart failure, yet the majority of the underlying signaling mechanisms remain poorly characterized. Protein phosphorylation is a key regulatory element with profound effects on the activity and function of signaling networks; however, there is a lack of comprehensive phosphoproteomic studies in human DCM patients. We assessed the hypothesis that an integrative phosphoproteomics analysis of human DCM would reveal novel phosphoprotein candidates involved in disease pathophysiology. Combined proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis of explanted left ventricular tissue samples from DCM patients ( n =4) and non-failing controls ( n =4) identified 5,570 unique proteins with 13,624 corresponding phosphorylation sites. From these analyses, we identified αT-catenin as a unique candidate protein with a cluster of 4 significantly hyperphosphorylated sites in DCM hearts ( P <0.0001), with no change in total αT-catenin expression at the protein level. Bioinformatics analyses of human datasets and confocal imaging of human and mouse cardiac tissue show highly cardiac-enriched expression of αT-catenin, localized to the cardiomyocyte intercalated disc. High resolution 3-dimensional reconstruction shows elongated intercalated disc morphology in DCM hearts (10.07±0.76 μm in controls vs. 17.20±1.87 μm in DCM, P <0.05, n =3/group), with significantly increased colocalization of αT-catenin with the intercalated disc membrane protein N-cadherin (Pearson’s coefficient 0.55±0.04 in controls vs. 0.71±0.02 in DCM, P <0.05, n =3/group). To investigate the functional role of cardiac αT-catenin phosphorylation, we overexpressed WT protein vs. non-phosphorylatable forms based on the loci identified in DCM hearts, in adult mouse cardiomyocytes using lentiviral transduction. Confocal imaging revealed significant internalization of the phospho-null form, as compared to the prominent intercalated disc staining of the WT protein (17.78±0.79% of WT vs. 9.25±0.49% of 4A mutant, P <0.0001, n =50 cells/group). Together, these findings suggest a critical role for αT-catenin phosphorylation in maintaining cardiac intercalated disc organization in human DCM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".