Neuroimaging and motor development of twins with congenital microcephaly associated with Zika virus: a case report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to describe a case of congenital microcephaly caused by Zika virus infection in a monozygotic twin pregnancy. Methods: Transfontanelle ultrasonography and cranial computed tomography revealed different lesion patterns for both twins with congenital microcephaly caused by Zika virus infection. Motor development assessments were performed using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale and the Gross and Motor Function Measure before, during, and after physiotherapy. Results: The evaluations showed differences in motor acquisition between the twins. The values in the first case were much lower than those in the second case, which showed more motor delay. Conclussion: The present study showed that despite the twins being monozygotic, the effects of neurological lesions as revealed by neuroimaging were worse in the first case, and even with two weekly rehabilitation sessions, motor development over time was considerably worse in the twin in case 1 than in the other twin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".