MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 11265: Sex-Specific Response to Endothelin-1 Overexpression Mediates Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Development

2021· article· en· W3216733311 on OpenAlexaff
Vivian S. Lee, Deepak Atri, Shamsudheen Karuthedath Vellarikkal, Pierre Paradis, Ernesto L. Schiffrin, Rajat M. Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Canadian institutionsJewish General HospitalHomewood Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAneurysmInternal medicineArterial stiffnessEndothelin receptorEndothelin 1Thoracic aortic aneurysmAortic aneurysmAortaCardiologySurgeryReceptorBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) are common diseases associated with high morbidity and mortality. Although TAAs are more common in men, women have worse outcomes and dissect at smaller aortic diameters. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is the most potent vasoconstrictor in humans, and an important mediator of vascular stiffness and tone. ET-1 levels are increased in patients with TAA, and genetic variants that affect ET-1 production and receptor expression are associated with vascular diseases. Though ET-1 levels do not differ between men and women with TAA, it is unknown if response to ET-1 mediates sex-specific differences. Hypothesis: ET-1 has different effects on vascular stiffness and aortic dissection risk in men and women. Methods: Angiotensin-II (AngII) was delivered subcutaneously at 1 ug/kg/min dose and rate using osmotic pumps for 28 days in endothelial cell-specific ET-1 transgenic (eET-1) and matched WT control mice. We measured blood pressure, aortic stiffness, and aortic size at the end of the study. Results: We observed marked sex-specific ET-1 effects on TAA. Despite elevated blood pressure in all animals that received AngII (Fig1A), we observed increased aortic stiffness in male eET-1 mice (+1.5 m/s eET-1 vs. +0.74 m/s WT) but decreased aortic stiffness in female eET-1 mice (-1.9 m/s eET-1 vs. +0.69 m/s WT), measured by pulse wave velocity (Fig1B). Consistent with these results, aortic diameter was only increased in male eET-1 mice (+0.61 mm eET-1 vs. +0.11 mm WT) but not in female eET-1 mice (+0.06 mm eET-1 vs. +0.11 mm WT) (Fig1C). Significantly, 2 of 3 male eET-1 animals died before 28 days from dissected TAAs, whereas all females survived the length of the study. Conclusions: In the AngII-TAA model, there is a sex dimorphic effect of ET-1 overexpression. Male mice have greater vascular stiffness and develop TAA in response to the same level of ET-1 as in matched female mice. This difference may explain the increased incidence of TAA in men.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches→French-language works237,207→