MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3216758305 · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2021-ioc.118

126 Association between baseline factors and risk of injury amongst pre-professional dancers

2021· article· en· W3216758305 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah Kenny, KV Vineetha Warriya, Luz Palacios‐Derflingher, Jackie L. Whittaker, Carolyn A. Emery, M. Critchley

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicWinter Sports Injuries and Performance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysical therapyDanceBalletMedicineBody mass indexPsychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Few investigations utilize evidence-informed pre-participation evaluation, inclusive injury definitions, and prospective surveillance to identify risk factors for dance-related injury. Objective To identify baseline injury risk factors that may be associated with dance-related musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints in pre-professional dancers. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Pre-professional ballet school; university dance program. Participants Dancers registered in full-time ballet [n=85, 77 females, median (range) age 15 years (11–19)] and contemporary [n=60, 58 females, 19 years (17–30)] training. Assessment of Risk Factors Pre-participation evaluation comprised of one-year injury history (yes/no), previous training (years), Athletic Coping Skills Inventory-28 (ACSI;score), body mass index (BMI;kg/m2), total bone mineral density (g/cm2), ankle plantar/dorsiflexion (degrees), active standing turnout (degrees), three lumbopelvic control tasks (high/low risk), unipedal dynamic balance (seconds), Y-Balance Test (cm). Weekly dance hours were self-reported throughout one academic year. Main Outcome Measurements Self-reported MSK complaints (any physical complaint leading to difficulties participating in dance, regardless of consequences) were captured weekly by online modified Oslo Sports Trauma Research Centre’s Questionnaire on Health Problems during academic year. MSK complaints were recorded (yes/no) for each participant for each week. Results Response rate was 99%, with 81% (117/145) of dancers reporting at least one MSK complaint. Of the 1521 complaints (19% first-time, 81% recurrent), ankle (22%), knee (21%), and foot (12%) accounted for majority. Potential factors were identified through systematic review and a generalized linear mixed model was used to analyze the binary outcome measure. Injury history [Odds Ratio (OR) 7.37; 95% CI (3.41, 15.91)] and previous week’s dance hours [OR 1.02; 95% CI (1.01, 1.03)] were significantly associated with MSK complaint. Conclusions Prevalence of MSK complaints amongst pre-professional ballet and contemporary dancers is high and significantly associated with injury history and training volume. Future studies implementing injury prevention should incorporate training load monitoring to address the dynamic, recursive nature of dance injury etiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoster presentationsSame topicWinter Sports Injuries and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207