Glucosylceramide in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with GBA-associated and idiopathic Parkinson’s disease enrolled in PPMI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protein-coding variants in the GBA gene modulate susceptibility and progression in ~10% of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). GBA encodes the β-glucocerebrosidase enzyme that hydrolyzes glucosylceramide. We hypothesized that GBA mutations will lead to glucosylceramide accumulation in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Glucosylceramide, ceramide, sphingomyelin, and lactosylceramide levels were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in CSF of 411 participants from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) cohort, including early stage, de novo PD patients with abnormal dopamine transporter neuroimaging and healthy controls. Forty-four PD patients carried protein-coding GBA variants (GBA-PD) and 227 carried wild-type alleles (idiopathic PD). The glucosylceramide fraction was increased (P = 0.0001), and the sphingomyelin fraction (a downstream metabolite) was reduced (P = 0.0001) in CSF of GBA-PD patients compared to healthy controls. The ceramide fraction was unchanged, and lactosylceramide was below detection limits. We then used the ratio of glucosylceramide to sphingomyelin (the GlcCer/SM ratio) to explore whether these two sphingolipid fractions altered in GBA-PD were useful for stratifying idiopathic PD patients. Idiopathic PD patients in the top quartile of GlcCer/SM ratios at baseline showed a more rapid decline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores during longitudinal follow-up compared to those in the lowest quartile with a P-value of 0.036. The GlcCer/SM ratio was negatively associated with α-synuclein levels in CSF of PD patients. This study highlights glucosylceramide as a pathway biomarker for GBA-PD patients and the GlcCer/SM ratio as a potential stratification tool for clinical trials of idiopathic PD patients. Our sphingolipids data together with the clinical, imaging, omics, and genetic characterization of PPMI will contribute a useful resource for multi-modal biomarkers development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".