Outcomes of High Grade B- Cell Lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 Rearrangements: An Atlantic Canadian Centre Perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: High Grade B cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements (also known as Double-hit lymphoma (DHL)) is an aggressive B cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma which has recently been recognized by the WHO as a distinct clinical entity from Diffuse Large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Compared to patients with DLBCL, patients with DHL have poor outcomes with standard R-CHOP chemoimmunotherapy, and the optimal treatment regimen for this high-risk lymphoma is unknown. Due to clinical and genetic overlap with Burkitt lymphoma (which shares translocations involving MYC), treatment of DHL with more intensive Burkitt lymphoma protocols is a common approach. However, these regimens are associated with significant toxicity, and the superiority of these regimens over standard R-CHOP remains uncertain. At our institution, R-CODOX-M/IVAC has been the preferred regimen for fit younger patients with DHL. Objective: To review the outcomes of patients with DHL treated with R-CODOX-M/IVAC at our institution. Methods: In this retrospective single-centre study, patients with DHL receiving R-CODOX-M/IVAC were identified by cross-referencing provincial cancer care data and hospital pharmacy data. All adult patients with a diagnosis of DHL and who were treated with R-CODOX-M/IVAC between January 2009 and January 2019 were included in the analysis. The primary outcomes is complete response (CR) per standard lymphoma response criteria. Secondary outcomes include median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival at 1 year, and median overall survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for survival analyses. Results: 14 patients with DHL and meeting the inclusion criteria were identified and included in the analysis. The complete response rate was 35.7%. With a median followup time of 26 months, the median PFS was 31.8 months, and the median OS was 54.3 months. The overall survival at 1 year was 77%. Conclusions: A previous meta-analysis demonstrated inferior outcomes for patients with DHL receiving RCHOP, with a median PFS of only 12.1 months. The optimal treatment of these patients remains to be defined. Dose-adjusted regimens have been associated with a significant improvement in PFS compared to RCHOP (21.6 months versus 12.1 months). Previous retrospective data suggests R-CODOX-M/IVAC results in more favourable outcomes 2 year PFS of 41% and 2 year OS of 53% (Sun et al., Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia, 2015). Our data, although limited, that R-CODOX-M/IVAC may be associated with improved outcomes compared to published results with RCHOP. The limitations of this study include its retrospective design, lack of matched controls receiving RCHOP, and its small sample size. Nevertheless, this study adds to the small body of available evidence on this difficult to treat clinical entity. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".