MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3217094571 · doi:10.14288/1.0343076

UBC Chancellor Boulevard & East Mall Intersection Redesign

2017· article· en· W3217094571 on OpenAlexaffabout
Joseph M. Braun, Mengyizhe He, Reza Jahanbakhsh, Amit Jain, Parinaz Shahmoradi, Zhu Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoulevardIntersection (aeronautics)Computer sciencePolitical scienceGeographyCartographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report outlines the detailed redesign of the intersection at Chancellor Boulevard and East Mall, at the University of British Columbia. The current intersection does not promote safety, user friendliness, nor does it meet the future anticipated traffic demand of the growing UBC campus. The new intersection design aims at mitigating these issues by placing a roundabout at the intersection. Meanwhile, at the southeast corner of the intersection, a pedestrian lookout platform was designed and detailed within the report. The report begins with discussing the project background information and overarching objectives. It then examines the technical standards governing the design, the software programs used, and the final detailed parameters of the design components. Lastly, the report concludes by presenting the refined cost estimates, construction schedule, work sequence, and additional environmental, stormwater, and First Nations considerations. The new roundabout shall replace the current two-way stop-controlled intersection, creating a safer and more disciplined travelling environment for its users. The City of Vancouver predicted that by 2030, over 66% of city’s transportation would be through sustainable transport, hence the roundabout has been designed for not only regular drivers, but also the rapidly growing number of pedestrians, cyclists and public transit users. The pedestrian lookout platform near the intersection will serve as an iconic landmark and provide an inviting gateway into the UBC campus. It has been designed to offer full wheelchair accessibility and optimum safety during any severe storm or seismic events. In addition, the consultant also investigated the existing stormwater management strategies in this region, and detected potential risks of flooding and cliff erosion on the north perimeter of the campus. In response, it is highly recommended that a subterranean detention tank along with perforated drainage pipes be installed directly east of the intersection. Project construction is set to begin on May 2nd 2016 and will extend until August 18th 2016. A detailed construction schedule and work required are presented in the report, as well as a phased traffic management plan (sensitive to high traffic events). Overall, the roundabout is expected to cost $980,140, and the pedestrian platform, $362,250. Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as well as their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a student project/report and is not an official document of UBC. Furthermore readers should bear in mind that these reports may not reflect the current status of activities at UBC. We urge you to contact the research persons mentioned in a report or the SEEDS Coordinator about the current status of the subject matter of a project/report.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.372
Threshold uncertainty score0.740

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0680.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen CollectionsSame topicTransportation Planning and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207