MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3217110777 · doi:10.82308/19842

Synthesis and application of optimal strictly negative imaginary controllers

2020· article· en· W3217110777 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ken Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace Engineering and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsThe ImaginaryComputer scienceEpistemologyPsychologyPhilosophyPsychoanalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis investigates the synthesis of optimal strictly negative imaginary (SNI) controllers. A recently emerged class of systems called negative imaginary (NI) systems are those characterized by a negative imaginary frequency response. A NI system connected in a positive feedback interconnection with a SNI controller is internally stable if and only if a DC gain condition is satisfied. This can be interpreted as a robust stability result in situations where plant uncertainty does not destroy the NI nature of the plant nor the DC gain condition. Motivated by a desire to realize improved closed-loop performance, this thesis considers the design of optimal SNI controllers. The proposed synthesis methods makes use of convex optimization and linear matrix inequality (LMI) tools. These synthesis methods are then examined in the context of various applications. In particular, this thesis considers tracking control on SO(3) and SE(3) for systems with counter-clockwise input-output dynamics (CCW). CCW input-output maps from torque to attitude, as well as from force and torque to position and attitude, are established for rigid-body motion. Using the properties of CCW systems and NI systems, a stabilizing SNI controller is shown to drive the tracking errors in position and attitude to zero. In addition, a method to synthesize the SNI controller associated with the tracking control problem in an optimal sense is presented. Finally, the control laws are extended to the formation control problem of networks of NI systems and networks of CCW systems. Numerical results are included to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed synthesis methods

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicAerospace Engineering and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207