MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 12756: Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Evinacumab in Adult and Adolescent Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

2021· article· en· W3217115154 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Gaudet, Samir Saheb, Gabriella Iannuzzo, Claudia Stefanutti, Erik S.G. Stroes, Robert S. Rosenson, Traci Turner, Shazia Ali, Poulabi Banerjee, Tiera Drewery, Robert Pordy, Jian Zhao, Frederick J. Raal

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFamilial hypercholesterolemiaPediatricsTerm (time)Internal medicineIntensive care medicineCholesterol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is an ultra-rare genetic lipid disorder characterized by elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, underscoring the need for early and aggressive treatment. Evinacumab, an angiopoietin-like 3 inhibitor, significantly reduced LDL-C in patients with HoFH in a pivotal Phase 3 trial (NCT03399786). The current study assesses long-term safety and efficacy of evinacumab in patients with HoFH. Methods: This is an interim analysis of an evinacumab open-label Phase 3 trial (NCT03409744) in adult and adolescent(12-<18 years) patients with HoFH. Patients who previously received evinacumab or who were evinacumab-naïve both received intravenous evinacumab 15 mg/kg every 4 weeks. Results: A total of 115 patients (50.4% male; mean [range] age 39 [12-75] years; 11.3% adolescent) were enrolled and treated for a mean (range) duration of 53 (4-132) weeks. At baseline, mean (standard deviation [SD]) LDL-C was 261.8 (160.5) mg/dL; 44 (38.3%) patients were receiving concomitant lipoprotein apheresis. At Week 24, data were available for 81 patients. From baseline to Week 24, evinacumab reduced mean LDL-C for all patients by 43.7% (mean [SD], 133.0 [125.9] mg/dL); mean LDL-C reduction for adult (n=72) and adolescent (n=9) subgroups was 42.6% (mean [SD], 126.7 [127.9] mg/dL) and 52.4% (mean [SD], 183.4 [101.6] mg/dL), respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 76 (66.1%) patients; one patient reported pregnancy which led to discontinuation of study treatment per protocol. Serious TEAEs were reported by 16 (13.9%) patients; two (1.7%) patients experienced a TEAE resulting in death, none of which were considered related to study treatment. Conclusions: In this large cohort of patients with HoFH, evinacumab markedly reduced LDL-C irrespective of age. Evinacumab was generally well tolerated, and the efficacy and safety of evinacumab was sustained over the long term.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health→French-language works237,207→