MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3217142529 · doi:10.15210/interfaces.v6i1.6932

O DESENVOLVIMENTO BRASILEIRO E CANADENSE NO SISTEMA INTERNACIONAL SEGUNDO ESTRATÉGIAS CONVERGENTES ENTRE O REGIONALISMO E O MULTILATERALISMO.

2012· article· pt· W3217142529 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elói Martins Senhoras

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Theory and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultilateralismPolitical scienceRegionalism (politics)HumanitiesInternational tradeWelfare economicsEconomicsPhilosophyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inserido no debate das razões para alcançar o desenvolvimento econômico, este trabalho apresenta-se para demonstrar a importância do regionalismo e do multilateralismo como variáveis complementares na agenda internacional do Brasil e do Canadá na nova interdependente ordem mundial. Não relegando a importância das políticas domésticas, o regionalismo e o multilateralismo nesses países têm sido analisados como políticas duplo-ganhadoras (win-win), nas quais a grande oportunidade a ser aproveitada pela consolidação internacional como componente essencial cada vez mais responsável pelo crescimento econômico está na raiz de uma estratégia conjunta de articulação de ganhos trazidos ao desenvolvimento. Com essa discussão são fornecidos os subsídios para a garantia de pluralidade e o aprofundamento do debate sobre as políticas internacionais para o desenvolvimento, que neste novo século têm grande importância para o bem-estar social e o futuro empresarial do Brasil e do Canadá. Abstract: Inserted in the reasons for the economic development, this paper aims to demonstrate the importance of regionalism and multilateralism as complementary variables in the international agenda of Brazil and Canada in the new interdependent world order. Not denying the role of domestic policies, regionalism and multilateralism in these countries have been considered as double-winner policies (win-win), while the great opportunity to be undertaken by the international consolidation as an essential component more and more responsible for the economic growth is in the root of a strategic team articulation of earnings brought to the development. Through this discussion assistance is supplied to warrantee plurality and depth for the debate about international policies focused to the development, that for this century have fundamental importance for the welfare and the future of business in Brazil and Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score0.616

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicEconomic Theory and PolicyFrench-language works237,207