Preface to CAMURE-11 & ISMR-10 Special Issue
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recommendations T he first CAMURE (Catalysis in Multiphase Reactor) meeting was launched in 1994 (Lyon, France) by Prof. Claude de Bellefon.It was followed by other meetings held in the following different venues: Toulouse (France) in 1998, Naples (Italy) in 2000, Lausanne (Switzerland) in 2002, and Portorose (Slovenia) in 2005.In 2005, in correspondence to the Symposium held in Portorose, the CAMURE Symposium was merged with ISMR (International Symposium on Multifunctional Reactors).The previous ISMR meetings were held in Amsterdam (The Netherlands) in 1999, Nuremberg (Germany) in 2001, and Bath (United Kingdom) in 2003.After 2005, the two merged symposia were held at Pune (India) in 2007, Montreal (Canada) in 2009, Naantali (Finland) in 2011, Lyon again in 2014, and Qingdao (China) in 2017; the most recent Symposium was scheduled to occur in Milano (Italy) May 31-June 3, 2020.The reason for merging the two symposia was the idea that enlarging the platform of discussion on, respectively, multiphase catalytic systems and multifunctional reactors can produce a positive synergetic effect in both fields.The CAMURE and ISMR joint Symposia offer an international interdisciplinary forum for exchanging information about the progress achieved in the world on, respectively, catalysis in multiphase reactors and the behavior of multifunctional reactors, considering, in particular, the importance of catalytic action, chemical kinetics, heat, mass transfer, and hydrodynamics in reactor modeling.These topics have been gradually enriched, considering many other different aspects, such as process intensification, catalysts design, membrane reactors, bioreactors, biocatalysis, and sustainable chemical processes with the scope to favor the interdisciplinary scientific and technological approach to all the mentioned topics.The International Scientific Committee (ISC) is composed of internationally well-reputed scientists (see the list reported below) operating in the field and active in the symposium organization.After the symposium held in China (2017), the International Scientific Committee elected two chairmen who were assigned the task of coordinating all of the Symposia activities.The elected Chairmen of the ISC are Prof.Claude de Bellefon (France) and Faical Larachi (Canada).Over the years, the CAMURE-ISMR Symposium has reached higher and higher levels of international participation.The ultimate scope of the Symposium is to design moreefficient chemical and biochemical reactors, more-efficient catalytic systems, and more-valuable chemical engineering reactor design and simulation.Another scope is to favor the contact between chemists and chemical engineers for a fruitful
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.288 | 0.251 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".